Why David Hockney Was Wrong About Los Angeles and Why It Mattered

Why David Hockney Was Wrong About Los Angeles and Why It Mattered

David Hockney first saw Los Angeles from the window of a commercial airplane in 1964. He looked down at the vast, grid-locked basin and didn't see smog, sprawl, or traffic. He saw blue. Hundreds of tiny, shimmering rectangles of turquoise blinking back at the California sun. To a twenty-six-year-old kid from Bradford, England—a city built on industrial soot, rain, and post-war austerity—this wasn't just a change of scenery. It was a hallucination of paradise.

Most people look at Hockney's Los Angeles paintings and see the ultimate celebration of Southern California leisure. They see the easy life, the mid-century modern architecture, and the wealth. But that's a superficial reading. What Hockney actually captured wasn't the real Los Angeles. He painted a highly stylized, deeply personal fantasy of a city that existed mostly in his own mind. He took a transient, chaotic metropolis and froze it into flat, silent blocks of acrylic color. Don't forget to check out our previous article on this related article.

By looking closely at five essential works from his Golden Era, you can see how an outsider invented the visual identity of a city we still recognize today.


The Illusion of the Perfect Splash

A Bigger Splash (1967)

This is the painting everyone knows. It defines the Hockney brand. You have a pristine, pink modernist bungalow, two completely static palm trees, a perfectly manicured patch of grass, and a director's chair sitting empty on a concrete patio. And then, right in the center, a violent explosion of white water. To read more about the history of this, The Hollywood Reporter provides an in-depth summary.

But here's what people miss about A Bigger Splash. It's a painting about a ghost. The diver is gone, swallowed by the pool. The human element has completely disappeared, leaving behind only the physical consequence of an action. Hockney famously spent two weeks using tiny camel-hair brushes to meticulously paint a splash that lasted less than two seconds in real life.

Think about the irony of that. He didn't paint this from life. He found a photograph of a pool splash in a magazine and copied it. The painting feels immediate, but it's actually cold, calculated, and slow. Hockney used paint rollers to apply layers of liquid acrylic, stripping away any evidence of his own brushstrokes on the background. He wanted the sky and the building to look completely flat, devoid of texture. By freezing a hyper-fast moment using an incredibly slow painting technique, Hockney created a sense of eerie, uncanny stillness. It's beautiful, but it's also profoundly lonely.


Domestication and Subversive Desires

Beverly Hills Housewife (1966)

Before he perfected the empty pool scene, Hockney was fascinated by the people who inhabited these sun-drenched spaces. Beverly Hills Housewife is a massive, two-panel painting that features art collector Betty Freeman standing on her patio. She's wrapped in a long pink dress, looking out at the viewer next to a sculptural lounge chair and a pristine glass showcase of her home.

This artwork exposes the bizarre friction at the heart of the California Dream. Freeman is surrounded by luxury, yet she looks isolated, almost trapped inside her own flawless aesthetic environment. The architecture is clean, open, and geometric, but the mood is entirely clinical.

Hockney was obsessed with the way Los Angeles homes blurred the line between the indoors and outdoors. Huge glass walls meant you were always on display. For a gay man arriving from a country where homosexuality was still illegal, this level of visibility was intoxicating. In the UK, life had to be hidden behind heavy curtains. In LA, everything was out in the open, flooded with harsh, unforgiving daylight. Yet, Beverly Hills Housewife shows that this total transparency came with its own kind of emotional paralysis.


The Hidden Tension of the Double Portrait

Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures) (1972)

In 2018, this canvas sold at Christie's for $90.3 million, making it one of the most expensive paintings by a living artist ever sold at auction. The market value is staggering, but the emotional cost of making it was even higher.

The painting depicts two men. One is swimming underwater, his body distorted by the rippling light of a turquoise pool. The other man, dressed in a sharp pink jacket, stands on the pool deck, looking down at the swimmer. The standing figure is Peter Schlesinger, Hockney's former lover and muse. The painting was completed just after their intense, painful breakup.

This isn't a casual scene of California leisure. It's a psychological autopsy of a dead relationship. Notice the distance between the two figures. The swimmer is completely submerged, unreachable and warped by the water, while Schlesinger stands on the edge, detached and looking down from a position of absolute emotional power. The background features the lush, rolling hills of Saint-Tropez—Hockney actually combined a pool photo taken in France with a studio portrait of Schlesinger shot in London's Kensington Gardens—but the visual language is pure Los Angeles.

The painting works because of its extreme contrasts. The water is bright and shimmering, but the emotional atmosphere is heavy and suffocating. It shows that even in paradise, people remain fundamentally unknowable to each other.


Shifting Perspectives on the Open Road

Pacific Coast Highway and Santa Monica (1990)

By the time the late 1980s and early 1990s rolled around, Hockney was done with the flat, static lines of his early pool paintings. He wanted to capture how it actually felt to move through Los Angeles. You don't experience LA by standing still; you experience it behind the wheel of a car.

Pacific Coast Highway and Santa Monica is a massive explosion of color that rejects traditional Western perspective. Instead of a single vanishing point, the painting forces your eyes to climb up the canvas, mimicking the dizzying drive from the flat coast up into the twisting roads of the Santa Monica Mountains.

The colors here aren't realistic. The roads are bright blue, the hills are neon green and hot pink, and the sky is a sliver of orange. Hockney was heavily influenced by cubism and Chinese scroll painting during this era. He realized that a camera only captures a single, static point of view, which he thought was inherently dishonest to human experience. When you drive down the PCH, you look left, right, up at the hills, and down at the dashboard. This painting stitches all those distinct moments into a single, kinetic landscape. It's loud, vibrant, and messy—just like the actual driving culture of the city.


Domestic Spaces on a Massive Scale

Large Interior, Los Angeles (1988)

Hockney often complained that traditional photography couldn't capture the true feeling of being inside a room. It makes spaces look small and enclosed. Large Interior, Los Angeles was his attempt to fix that.

This painting uses a technique called reverse perspective. Instead of lines converging at a point far away from you, the furniture and floorboards seem to widen as they move deeper into the room, pulling you directly into the scene. The room features an assortment of brightly colored chairs, a patterned rug, a houseplant, and a deck that looks out into the typical California greenery.

It feels theatrical. By skewing the angles of the couches and tables, Hockney turned a mundane living room into a dynamic, slightly unstable stage. You're not just looking at a painting of a living room; you feel like you're standing right in the center of it, navigating the space with your own body. It showed that even after decades in the city, Hockney was still finding new ways to reinvent how we look at ordinary domestic life.


Why Hockney's Myth Endures

The common mistake people make when looking at Hockney's California archive is assuming he was a realist painter documentation guy. He wasn't. He was a mythmaker.

He arrived in a city that locals often found ugly, dangerous, and fragmented, and he filtered it through his own desire for freedom, light, and beauty. He used acrylic paint—a brand new medium at the time that dried quickly and left a bright, plastic finish—to match the synthetic, sun-bleached reality of modern suburbia. He gave Los Angeles an iconic visual signature that the city didn't even know it needed.

If you want to understand Hockney's work beyond the postcard cliches, stop focusing on the glamour. Look at the surfaces. Look at how hard he worked to make things look completely effortless. The next time you see A Bigger Splash, don't just dream about the pool. Think about the two weeks an artist spent alone in a studio, carefully painting every single droplet of water, just to capture a moment that was already gone.

If you want to explore this aesthetic firsthand, your next move is straightforward. Skip the textbook analyses. Go to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) or Tate Modern in London. Stand right in front of these massive canvases. Look at the scale. Notice the deliberate flat spots where the roller hit the canvas. See how your own eye moves across his distorted roads. That's how you actually learn to see like Hockney.

JE

Jun Edwards

Jun Edwards is a meticulous researcher and eloquent writer, recognized for delivering accurate, insightful content that keeps readers coming back.